Claws are out over India's tiger resurgence

By Gautaman Bhaskaran

CHENNAI - The Indian tiger is burning bright. Or, so says the latest census released in March. According to the National Tiger Conservation Authority and Wildlife Institute of India, numbers of the national animal have grown by 12%.

The 2006 census put the population at 1,411, while the 2010 survey estimates that there are now 1,706 of these majestic creatures living in the wild, though this include a hitherto uncounted 70 animals in West Bengal's riverine Sundarbans.

Tiger enthusiasts are jubilant that the big cat is thriving, against seemingly insurmountable odds. But some experts areunconvinced over the government's methodology.

A double sampling process was used - first, data were collected by using standardized protocols, including pug marks, the availability of prey, the condition of habitats and so on. Later, cameras were used, but only in 5% of the total area investigated.

Y V Jhala, a scientist from the Wildlife Institute of India who coordinated the census, said 800 cameras were installed for about 50 days, and 615 tigers were photographed and identified by their unique stripe patterns. "The camera trap intensity of one per 4 square kilometers is the highest in the world. The extrapolation from 615 photographed tigers to an estimate of 1,706 was based on peer-reviewed methodology standardized in the 2006 census", Jhala added.

However, Ullas Karanth, the renowned scientist-conservationist heading the Center for Wildlife Studies in Bangalore, laments that "the full process of how these tiger numbers are generated for individual tiger populations and landscapes has not been made public in a scientifically acceptable manner".

He feels that there are "serious deficiencies" in the methodologies used, leaving him unconvinced about the rise in the tiger population, particularly in the face of the animal's devastatingly rapid decimation in the past.

Karanth may be quite right to wonder how these felines could have multiplied in these four years since many of the dangers they face are still present.

At the end of the 19th century, 40,000 tigers roamed the length and breadth of India. But hunting for sport, and later for commerce saw most of them die. In 1972, when it was found that there were less than 2,000 of these animals left in the wild, prime minister Indira Gandhi established Project Tiger. Special reserves were created out of existing national parks and forests, and new laws were enacted to save the tiger, and in the next 15 years, its population is believed to have risen.

However, the next two decades saw intense neglect of the nation's wildlife. Tigers were driven to near extinction, with international specialists issuing one warning after another. Among them was the renowned tiger specialist Peter Jackson, who ticked off the Indian administration by saying that one tiger was being killed everyday by poachers.

Some officials, smug in their bureaucratic positions, dismissed Jackson's words as hollow rhetoric, typical of a white man's limited vision of the Orient. Until, an explosive revelation came in 2004. A journalist broke the news that the Sariska Tiger Reserve in Rajasthan, claiming to be home to about 18 cats, had, in fact, none at all. Earlier, the Rajasthan Forest Department dismissed persistent rumors of tiger poaching in the Reserve, and said that the animals had merely migrated and would come back after the rains. The Project Tiger, now renamed the National Tiger Conservation Authority, endorsed this view. True, true, it agreed without batting an eyelid.

The media expose, when it came, shook the country, and a quick check confirmed the worst fears. Not one tiger at Sariska had lived to tell the tale of murderous men who had systematically butchered just about every big cat there - and sold its parts for a fortune. The government turned red with embarrassment and had to admit that poaching was to blame. It was a national shame repeated in other reportedly well-protected reserves.

The causes for this are well known, but often glossed over or denied. The demand for tiger skins, bones, penises and other parts has been touted as a cure in Chinese traditional medicine for a number of ailments, sexual impotency included. With China's tigers completely gone, poachers turned their attention to India, where poverty and ineffective implementation of laws made it a cakewalk for them. They really had a free run.

India's exploding population and industrial growth led to human encroachments of forest land, and the tiger found itself with insufficient prey. (An adult tiger needs one deer every week.) So, it began to sneak into villages - on the periphery of forests and sometimes well within them - and take away cattle. Faced with economic losses arising out of such livestock destruction, villagers first tried poisoning the tigers, but later understood the rewards to be gained helping poachers, who were perfectly willing to share a small part of their booty with the poverty stricken rural masses.

read full story

Shooting from the heart

CHANDIGARH: India's first woman wildlife photographer Rathika Ramasamy had to wait for six months at Bharatpur bird sanctuary to click a perfect shot of a Saras crane pair. On her visit to the city, she narrated her close encounters with snakes, lions and gleaming birds of African jungles and Indian bird sanctuaries. For her, the most interesting work so far has been shooting Saras crane at Bharatpur bird sanctuary, Rajasthan.

Describing her 'perfect shoot', she said she had to wait for six months to shoot photographs of a Saras crane pair at Bharatpur. 'I waited for the right moment to capture elaborate courtship dances being engaged in by these cranes. When I got the shot, I was on seventh heaven. These photographs are possibly the best of my collection,' she said.

She has been regularly visiting national parks in and around Delhi to keep her zeal alive. She got into more active photography by shooting wildlife, especially wild cats, sitting patiently in hiding to catch the cats in action. She then zeroed in on the birds. 'I am a nature-friendly person and used to visit bird sanctuaries. I grew up visiting bird sanctuaries near my native place,' she added.

While she specializes in bird photography, she is also into wildlife photography. 'I remember a time when we were stuck at Nehru Park, New Delhi. While clicking photos of a lion that came suddenly in front of our vehicle, when we tried to move back, an elephant was coming from the other side. However, we managed to escape. I will never want to face such an experience again,' she added.

With her first SLR camera that she got from her uncle, Dr Appasamy, an amateur photographer, Rathika started capturing nature's moments like blooming flowers and swaying trees. 'My first candid shot was of my parents in the house that is close to my heart,' she said.

read full story

You'll meet the locals as well as wildlife at this new reserve

Parambikulam Wildlife Sanctuary is the final link in a chain of reserves across southern India. And it's not just for rich tourists, says Sarah Barrell

Sunday, 13 March 2011


'Nothing stinks and everything is pleasant." So concludes the welcome film at India's newest tiger reserve. I'm at base camp in Parambikulam Wildlife Sanctuary, a little-known, recently created conservation area in eastern Kerala.

Myself and some 15 Indian tourists are jockeying for position in front of a screen in the spanking new interpretation centre watching a list of "dos and don'ts" aimed at those unfamiliar with the conventions of a nature reserve. That goes for most of the group.

Wildlife safaris are new to India's domestic travel market, partly because posh lodges in tiger tourism hub states such as Madhya Pradesh price out many local visitors. Day-tripping was the only easy way to visit Parambikulam until last year when basic camp facilities were added. Apart from my British companion and me, visitors to the reserve today are all from Kerala and neighbouring Indian states. A minibus transports us en masse, from the broiling Tamil Nadu town of Annamalai, past orderly groves of coconut palms, teeming villages and litter-strewn streams.


An hour later we bump on to the sole Forest Department road that climbs up through the wilderness of the Western Ghats towards the park. On arrival in camp, first impressions are of an old Indian army base renovated to resemble a child's playground. "That looks like one I might have made," says my companion, raising an eyebrow to a roughly hewn wooden table.


The same could have been said about the bamboo raft we clambered on to later. Somewhat alarmingly, the craft is used for croc-spotting; its gap-tooth, rustic finish generously allowing us to track the hefty mugger crocodile as it slips off the bank and passes beneath us. Parambikulam was created in 2007, but India's Environment and Forests Minister declared the reserve officially open only last year. It's just beginning to turn its hand to tourism.


But should tourists be here at all? Last year, in the face of plummeting tiger numbers, there were rumblings from the Indian government about severely limiting travel to the subcontinent's 38 big cat reserves. The debate is raging about the place for tourism in India's national parks: is it aiding or adding to the problem of the country's diminishing tiger numbers? Wildlife tourists are traditionally wealthy and foreign – their money often funding smart lodges rather than the conservation of the animals they've come to see. Apart from scientists and rangers, say critics, humans shouldn't be present in India's parks at all.


The more informed side of the argument, a view that Parambikulam shares, is that managed carefully, tourism is an essential part of promoting, protecting and sustaining India's wildlife and tribal communities, as it has been in the best South African and Amazonian reserves. Parambikulam was created to form the missing link in a chain of seven conservation areas stretching 4,000sq km across the middle of southern India. It's partly run by indigenous tribes who live on the land, and entrance is restricted to 30 vehicles a day, most of those aboard regulated buses that must come and go before sunset. Movement around the park is very restricted, too. Wildlife-watching is done in the equivalent of a public bus, along more or less the same prescribed route and only at dusk.


read full story

India’s first woman wildlife photographer visits Chandigarh

By Jaideep Mander

CHANDIGARH: Pixel Palette organized an interactive session with India’s first woman wildlife photographer Rathika Ramasamy on March 12, Saturday at the Chandigarh Press Club.
The event began at 11:30 a.m. one of the top 20 photographers of India, Rathika briefly explained the concept of photography and wildlife photography through a presentation that contained number of beautiful photographs of birds and animals. She told how to capture photographs in their natural pose without disturbing the subject.

Much inclined towards bird- photography, Rathika said that it is a much more challenging task to capture birds whether perched or in flight as they just flick away in no time even with the shutter sound. Rathika said that there should be a strong and undisturbed coordination between the eyes, hands and mind to click photographs of birds. Besides, one needs to keep a continuous watch over the birds and animals to shoot the desired picture. Rathika also shared a few close encounters in the wilderness and warned that there should be minimum of 3-4 feet gap between the subject and the photographer to avoid attack by the subject wild animal.

Rathika briefly explained settings for focus, lights, shots, midtone adjustments, shutter priorities, shutter speeds, highlighting modes, metering modes for digital cameras, histogram readings and other settings suitable for various kinds of shots. She also told the importance of composition of a picture. Rathika talked about the dos and don’ts while shooting a good landscape in sunlight, low light, snow, fog and rain as well. She gave tips regarding the type of cameras and other equipments that a person must use to suit the type of shots he desires to take.

Rathika emphasized that for a perfect wildlife photograph, a person should have 40% knowledge of the techniques of photography and 60% knowledge of his subject and the nature. She also said that to be a wildlife photographer one has to have immense love for the nature. She stressed upon the fact that some people for the sake of their photography, disturb the nature and its creatures which is very wrong and immoral.

Read full Story..

Save The Tiger In India.......


The next five years are going to be extremely critical if we are to save India's Tigers & forests.



Submit Your Review